|
|
| HOW
I ENDED THIS SUMMER (KAK YA PROVEL ETIM LETOM)
(director/writer: Alexei
Popogrebsky; cinematographer: Pavel Kostomarov;
editor: Ivan
Lebedev; music: Dmitry Katkhanov; cast: Grigory Dobrygin (Pavel
Danilov ), Sergei Puskepalis (Sergei Gulybin);
Runtime: 130; MPAA Rating: NR; producers: Roman Borisevich/Alexander
Kushaev; Film Movement; 2010-Russia-in Russian
with English subtitles) "Bleak and unfulfilling psychological thriller set at a Russian meteorological camp on a desolate island in the Arctic Circle." Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz Russian filmmaker Alexei Popogrebsky ("Simple Things"/"Roads to Koktebel") is writer-director of this bleak and unfulfilling psychological thriller set at a Russian meteorological camp on Chukotka (in the film the island is called Archym), a desolate island in the Arctic Circle, on Siberia's northeastern extremity, that's manned by the gruff fifty-something serious old-school scientist Sergei Gulybin (Sergei Puskepalis) and the frivolous twenty-something iPod-toting new grad student apprentice Pavel (Grigory Dobrygin). The men are the island's only residents and live in a dilapidated shack and take regular readings of weather conditions with their antiquated equipment from their radioactive surroundings and call it in regularly by radio to the mainland HQ. The drab setting, the dull
work and that the Odd Couple are polar opposites from
different generations and have different lifestyles
sets an eerie tension in the film's first half, where
not much happens but it seems like some kind of
strained father-son relationship is emerging. When an
urgent radiogram arrives for Sergei from HQ with bad
news about his wife and infant son, for
some inexplicable reason Pavel, who was just chewed
out by his languid taskmaster boss for his shoddy work
and relaying false data to HQ, doesn't have the nerve
to give him the message and because of that the film
shifts gears and becomes an unconvincing survivalist
film. The contrived plot never kicks in as something
credible, so the suspenseful chase scene between the
two men (one who can't change his old ways and the
other who fails to act responsibly) over the island's
tundra never becomes tense. What
remains powerful are the haunting images from the
hand-held camera, giving the setting a
post-apocalyptic look of modern man as an alienated
being trying to survive in isolation and in a harsh
landscape. The
film's allegorical
message is a heavy-handed one
that there's a split in modern Russia between the
old-timers who only know about duty and life's
hardships and the young generation of consumers who
are only looking for pleasure and don't want to be
reminded of the past. Whether this is true or not,
remains to be seen, but no profundity
is reached in a film that is dreary in every turn it
takes and in its conclusion is not sure of what it
wants to say. It
won the best film award at the 2010 London Film
Festival. REVIEWED ON 1/11/2012 GRADE: C+ Dennis Schwartz: "Ozus' World Movie Reviews" © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ |