|
|
|
IN SAYING EVERYTHING ABOUT A MOVIE? |
| ANAMORPH (director/writer: H.S. Miller; screenwriter: Tom Phelan; cinematographer: Fred Murphy; editor: Geraud Brisson; music: Reinhold Heil/Johnny Klimek; cast: Willem Dafoe (Stan Aubray), Scott Speedman (Carl Uffner), Clea Duvall (Sandy Strickland), James Rebhorn (Chief Lewellyn Brainard), Peter Stormare (Blair Collet), Deborah Harry (Neighbor), Amy Carlson (Alexandra Fredericks), Don Harvey (Killer), Samantha MacIvor (Crystal); Runtime: 104; MPAA Rating: R; producer: Marissa McMahon; IFC Films; 2007) |
| "Creepy, turgid and cerebral mind-game serial
killer flick."
Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz H.S. Miller's first feature film was shot on location in
NYC. Miller directs and
cowrites it with Tom Phelan. It's a creepy, turgid and cerebral
mind-game serial killer flick, that poses its serial killer as a better
artist than the haunted cop hunting him down. Anamorph is a
well-presented but nevertheless gloomy and murky mood piece of
frightening tableaux, that feels edgy but never feels just
right (there's no character development other than the detective's) and
becomes too abstract to warm up to as anything but an oddball puzzler
for those art lovers who are not squeamish and whose taste in paintings
might run towards Francis Bacon. The title is derived from a
Renaissance art technique called anamorphosis, that manipulates the
laws of perspective to create
two competing images on a single canvas. Stan Aubray (Willem Dafoe) is a lifeless,
laconic, guilt-ridden, loner NYPD detective, who received fame five
years ago for cracking the 'Uncle Eddie' serial killer case. The perp
was killed in a raid by the police, and thereby it's only the police's
version that they got the right guy--which they assume they did because
there were no other follow-up incidents. When five years later a day
trader is mutilated the same way as 'Uncle Eddie' did it (using his
body parts to reproduce a famous art work) Stan is called in to help a
young brash loquacious lead investigator Carl Uffner (Scott
Speedman). This is the first case Stan has worked on since the
infamous one that made his career as he spends his time now drinking
booze out of tiny airliner bottles; buying antique chairs for his
nearly bare NYC flat; wondering if he could have saved the life of the
last victim Crystal (Samantha
MacIvor), a street prostitute, if he
warned her to stay out of the area where he was trying to flush out the
killer; teaching at the Police Academy a course about homicide
crime scenes; and hanging around with an eccentric art historian/antiques dealer (Peter Stormare), who helps him with
the case through his art expertise. The press is calling this a copycat
crime, and since the M.O. is the same as the 'Uncle Eddie' crimes it
could be a copycat crime or perhaps they never got the real serial
killer (as his partner Carl believes). Eviscerated bodies keep popping up
as gruesome works of art, with their bodies painted in blue, as the
detective is forced to relive painful memories from the past as he
investigates. His only female friend is a former prostitute named Sandy
Strickland (Clea Duvall), with
an alcohol problem, a friend of Crystal's,
who he keeps meeting when she donates blood. The killer
seems to have a bead on the cop and has already killed one of the cops
that killed the supposed serial killer and has been spotted hanging
around the AA meetings that Sandy attends. Meanwhile the gaunt Stan
works feverishly to reconstruct the crime scenes, in the process
contaminating the evidence in order to get into the mindset of the
killer. This is a character driven movie,
that has the obsessive
compulsive detective, someone who is afraid to get close to people but
is a tactile person, becoming the killer's obsession and thereby
becoming one with the killer. It should work for a
limited audience of the genre, even though it's far from a satisfactory
horror film--its story and characters are too paper thin. But its
production values are top notch art design, though of the macabre kind.
While Dafoe's manic performance is the driving force behind this weird
flick, even though the psychological thriller just can't rise to be as
good as Zodiac and would most likely not suit a mainstream audience
because of all its odd touches, nuances, a puzzling conclusion and that
it's much to different from the usual Hollywood slasher film. REVIEWED ON 3/21/2010 GRADE: B Dennis Schwartz: "Ozus' World Movie Reviews" © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ |