|
|
| A DANGEROUS METHOD
(director: ;
screenwriters: based on his stage play “The Talking Cure” and the book “A Most
Dangerous Method: The Story of Jung, Freud, and Sabina
Spielrein” by John Kerr; cinematographer: Peter Suschitzky;
editor: Ronald
Sanders; music: Howard Shore; cast: (Sabina Spielrein), (), (), Sarah Gadon (Emma Jung),
Vincent Cassel (Otto Gross), André
Hennicke (Professor
Eugen Bleuler); Runtime: 99; MPAA Rating: R;
producer: Jeremy
Thomas; Sony
Pictures Classics; 2011-Canada/Germany) "Its eye for detail makes things so real and worthy of a work of scholarship." Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz ("Videodrome"/"The Dead
Zone"/"Spider"), one of the world's greatest living
directors and one of my favorites, brilliantly, accurately, perceptively
and sensibly
helms this historical drama. The oddly driven film on
the workings of the unconscious mind and irrationality
of sexual behavior gives us a clear heads up into the
beginning days of psychoanalysis. mostly uses the subjects
own written letters and journals to verify the truth
of their actions depicted here in a nine year span
from 1904 to 1913, as it covers the beginning and
ending of a friendship between the last century's two
giants in the field of psychology--Freud and
Jung--each motivated by personal ambitions to be a
leading figure in the field and second to no one else.
It was filmed mostly in Germany, which takes the place
of the sites in Switzerland that no
longer looked like they did back then in the early
20th century. It's based on the true
story of the Russian-born Jewish daughter of a wealthy
businessman, Sabina Spielrein (), a
patient of both Carl Jung ()
and later of Sigmund Freud (),
who was to become a psychoanalyst in Russia and
destined for a tragic fate after she had come to terms
with her inner demons through psychoanalysis but
Europe hadn't gotten rid of its demons and we learn in
the end credits the Nazis captured her Russian town in
1941 and killed her and all the other Jews in it.
Sabina came between Freud and Jung but, nevertheless,
influenced both to strive to learn more about
themselves as they learned more about her and heeded
her contribution to psychology that desire is an instinctive threat to one's ego.
Cronenberg's
intelligent, theatrical, restrained and talkative
adaptation of Christopher Hampton's play The Talking Cure and John
Kerr’s non-fiction book A Most Dangerous Method boldly uses the affair Jung
had with his patient to let us in on both his ideas
and his father-figure mentor Freud's ideas on how to
help neurotics get a better hold of their life through
what may be called the method of 'the talking cure.' In 1904, 18-year-old Sabina
Spielrein arrives by coach in a screaming crazed fit,
with body contortions and her jaw jutting out, at
Zurich's Burghölzli Mental
Hospital, where the young will
treat her for hysteria. The Vienna dwelling Sabina was
recommended to the Protestant Jung, the son of a
pastor, by the Jewish Freud, who welcomes Jung's
interest in following his new way of treating
neurotics by letting the patients themselves tell the
doctor what's wrong and by use of free-association to
reveal repressed things about themselves they may be
ashamed about ever facing without such therapy. With
no procedure in place on how to perform this novel
treatment but understanding Freud didn't want the
patient to face the doctor so as to be influenced by
their gestures, Jung, not aware at this time of
Freud's couch, sits behind the patient and she tells
of enjoying being whipped by her father as it sexually
arouses her. After being successfully treated by this
new method, Jung encourages the intelligent patient,
with the approval of the clinic's progressive
director, Professor
Eugen Bleuler (André Hennicke), to
assist him with his other patients and to study at the
university to become qualified to be a therapist. When
Sabina tries to seduce Jung, married to the wealthy
Emma (Sarah Gadon),
he at first resists but changes his mind when treating
the disturbed but charming Vienna psychoanalyst Otto
Gross (Vincent
Cassel), another patient sent to him
courtesy of Freud. The gentile Gross is a brilliant
free-thinking, coke-snorting, libertine,
who has a troubling Oedipal relation with his
scientist doctor dad and is all id--the dark
unconscious territory where the monsters and our feral
sides dwell. Jung finally succumbs to Otto's appealing
argument to not
repress anything and give the patient what
she wants, and the virgin Sabina becomes his mistress.
The
strains between Freud and Jung grow out of Jung, at
his first meeting in Vienna with Freud, questioning
the seductive authoritarian psychoanalyst's dogmatic
belief that every neuroses could be explained as a
sexual problem and that Jung wanted to bring his
mystic beliefs into play as part of psychology but was
told he couldn't. Jung's insistence on mysticism being
part of psychology made Freud paranoid, as he feared
his methods would then be criticized for not being
scientific and in anti-Semitic Austria, something Jung
was oblivious about, where Jews couldn't even receive
government positions, Freud was sure critics would
surface ready to use this unscientific probe into
spiritualism and the paranormal as an excuse to not
accept such questionable theories from Freud's mostly
Jewish followers. It's
an unnerving film, that is smashing as a case study
and invigorating as drama and enlightening as a look
at the significant personalities that shaped the
direction of modern psychology. It indeed shows us a
dangerous, limited and controversial method
uncovered to treat the mentally ill, in a film that
is so well-researched, the acting is so superb
(there's a tremendous chemistry between all the
characters and an ability by them to inhabit their
characters so well), the Wagner music is so fitting
for the mythical story and that its eye for detail
makes things so real and worthy of a work of
scholarship. It's a film that can make you feel
guilty for repressing things and anxious for being
so open, yet be so goofy in the way it conveys its
ideas even if it's so heady a film. It's a film for
the demanding film-goer who wants to get off with a
real mindbender, one that explores both the dark and
light aspects to sexual desire in order to ponder
what we really are like as humans by looking
inward--just like the rivals Freud and Jung did
their entire lives, in their own scientific ways. REVIEWED ON 4/9/2012 GRADE: A Dennis Schwartz: "Ozus' World Movie Reviews" © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DENNIS SCHWARTZ |